Look How Crowdsourcing and Generous People Are Helping to Save Irreplaceable Water-Damaged Photos

by | Last updated Apr 21, 2017 | Storing Originals, Restoring Digitals | 0 comments

Screen capture of article on Pressconnects.com by Valerie Zehl

“Neighbors: Expert's advice may help save flood-damaged photos” — Copyright © 2012 www.pressconnects.com.

I just came across this very positive and endearing article about a woman by the name of Rebecca Manson who volunteered for six months, working to save other peoples' flood-damaged photos.

At first, I thought it was going to be a completely negative story. Valerie Zehl starts out her article on Pressconnects.com telling us about a horrible situation that Ann Olsen of Endwell, NY found herself in last September.

Valerie explains that, “Ann's Castle Gardens home was inundated. Hundreds — including one-of-a-kind shots of her late mother and brother — were underwater. When she could get to them days later she tried to make ‘photo sandwiches' with absorbent material between the wet pictures, but could do only a few of them.”

At that moment while I was reading this, I felt so bad for Anne. I really can't imagine what that must feel like to look down at these “smelly, flood-muddied crates” and know that what's left inside used to be all of your priceless photographs.

And then my next thought continued to be honest but was a more selfish one. I counted my own blessings with my family's photo collection and the excellent condition it's still in. I am so thankful all of my photos — at least so far – has survived disasters like this.

Olsen couldn't bear to throw her damaged photos to the curb so she went to the internet looking for an answer. She found a video about Rebecca Manson, a photo-retoucher who put her career on hold and donated 6 months of her life to save water-damaged photographs of tsunami victims in Japan.

Via Facebook, Olsen hooked up with Manson, and what started out to be just an exchange of “written instructions about her process for dealing with flooded photos,” turned out to be something far better.

Manson, who works professionally with advertising agencies, magazines such as GQ and high-end store catalogs, offered to come to a nearby location of Olsen's and hold a free workshop on “cleaning damaged photos” for anyone who wants to attend. The article reads that she only asked that Olsen helps to coordinate this late April event!

Crowd-Sourcing Help from the Internet

What I truly found amazing in this article was not just how amazing Rebecca Manson is for all that she has so graciously done for others and their photo collections. I was also blown away with how she has leveraged the power of the internet and the generosity of others to exponentially help out.

This is how Rebecca Manson worked her magic for the tsunami victims in Japan:

Rebecca Manson with photos drying

Rebecca Manson works to dry photos damaged by the tsunami in Japan.

Thousands photos drying after Japan's tsunami

With the help of dozens of helpers, they cleaned hundreds of thousands of photographs.

Manson apparently scanned the ones that needed the most restoration help and “sent them through the Internet to a network of 450 restorers in 25 countries.”

In the beginning, she sent the request for help to 25 to 30 of her friends. About 15 to 20 of them replied back and said, “Yes that's a great idea!” and wanted to help her out. Soon, that number turned to over 400 volunteers!

The above video says in addition to countries from India to Afghanistan, at least one person in every state of the United States agreed to help out.

Rebecca Manson scanning photos

Rebecca Manson scanning photos to send off to volunteers around the world for photo retouching.

Wow! Incredible! I just love the internet — and of course… good-hearted people!

This “crowd-sourcing” technique, similar to the likes used on Kiva.org and Kickstarter.com, can really do amazing things for people with real needs, wants and dreams.

If you would like to read the entire article, check out: “Neighbors: Expert's advice may help save flood-damaged photos.”

For another link for the video above, check out Rebecca Manson's website page that also has the ABC News source article “Tsunami Damaged Photos Repaired By Volunteers Around the World.”

Additionally, if you're interested in attending a “cleaning damaged photos” workshop (like the one described above) contact Ann Olsen via e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (607) 768-9533.

Are You Ready to Get Serious With Your Photo Collection?

Join 10,280+ people enjoying the exclusive newsletter, tutorials, occasional blog updates, and tips and tricks you won't find anywhere else on this website sent right to your inbox.

Are You Ready to Get Serious With Your Photo Collection?

Join 10,280+ people enjoying the exclusive newsletter, tutorials, occasional blog updates, and tips and tricks you won't find anywhere else on this website sent right to your inbox.

Popular Posts

Epson Scan 2 — Will It Work With My Scanner?
Epson Scan 2 — Will It Work With My Scanner?

Epson quietly released a new version of their popular scanning software “Epson Scan” that comes bundled with their document and flatbed photo scanners. But, there’s already been confusion as to which scanners and operating systems it supports. Could it be possible that “Epson Scan 2” won’t even run in the latest versions of Microsoft Windows?

Epson V800 vs V850 — The 5 Differences and Which You Should Buy
Epson V800 vs V850 — The 5 Differences and Which You Should Buy

So you’re ready to buy a very high-quality flatbed scanner to digitize your analog prints and film, but now you’re having a hard time deciding between the Epson Perfection V800 Photo and the Epson Perfection V850 Pro Photo Scanners.

Whether you or an avid hobby photographer, a true professional, or just want to get all the quality you can out of your prints and film, either one of these models is going to give you exceptional results. But, I want to help you feel confident you’re going to make the right choice.

Below, in plain English that will make it very easy to understand, I’ve written out and explained in detail, the 5 differences between the two models.

Are 99.9% of Your Photographs Just Not Important Enough To Save?
Are 99.9% of Your Photographs Just Not Important Enough To Save?

If this was your entire photo collection sitting in this trash can in the photo above, would this make you actually feel relief … or utter panic?

What if I added to this scenario. What if to the best of your knowledge, all of your photos sitting in the trash were already scanned and safely backed up on a couple of your hard drives.

Do you now feel relieved … or still utterly panicked?

From everyone I have talked to about this scenario, it seems safe for me to say that I believe the world is in somewhat of a divide whether it’s actually okay to throw away your prints and slides once they have been scanned and digitally preserved.

And for some, hopefully not too many, I am sure they would say it’s okay to throw away many if not most photos before they were scanned and preserved.

Yes. You heard me.

If You Don’t Add This to the Filename of Your Scanned Photos, You’ll Probably Hate Yourself Later
If You Don’t Add This to the Filename of Your Scanned Photos, You’ll Probably Hate Yourself Later

Whether you keep all of your scanned master (original) image files in folders on a hard drive, or you allow an image manager like Picasa, iPhoto or Aperture to manage them inside a library file, you will still be required to give each photo a filename.

It could be as simple and non-descriptive as “photo-1.jpg” or maybe even simple yet somewhat descriptive like “mom at the beach 1984.tif”.

But, it’s actually a very important part of the process of scanning photos, that if done with a little bit of forethought, can save you a lot of time and headache later.

My Inspiring Photo Scanning Progress Report for April 2012
My Inspiring Photo Scanning Progress Report for April 2012

Welcome to my third monthly progress report!

Last month I covered two complete months of scanning, but I learned that was just too much to talk about!

So this time is only one month and it’ll be a lot shorter.

What This Progress Report Is Really About:

Every month, I am posting a detailed report — just like this one — sharing with you how far I have come with my goal to scan and restore my entire 10,000+ family photo collection.

By doing so, I hope to inspire you to do the same!

In my first progress report, I set a goal for myself to do a little bit of work on my collection every single day. I shoot for about an hour a day which turns out to be about 30 scans a day. And I am going to record and detail each one of them so that you can learn from my transparency.

I don’t want to be “that guy” — a guy that tells you how you should scan your own photos but then sends all of my own to a scanning service to do the work for me.

How Quickly You Could Scan Your Entire Photo Collection — What I Discovered From My First Week of Scanning
How Quickly You Could Scan Your Entire Photo Collection — What I Discovered From My First Week of Scanning

So you have a closet with boxes full of old prints and slides that you are dying to have scanned and neatly organized on your computer.

The problem is, you’re worried about it either costing you way too much money to send it to a scanning service, or taking too much of your precious free time to scan them yourself on a flatbed scanner.

Does this sound EXACTLY like your dilemma?

I’d like to share with you my experience back scanning photos for the first week. If you want to make scanning your own photos fit into your busy and hectic life, I think my experience here might give you an idea how much time will be involved and how many photos you can easily get through.

The Best Way to Add a Description (Caption) to Your Scanned Photos
The Best Way to Add a Description (Caption) to Your Scanned Photos

Ah, there’s nothing quite like reading a great caption to go along with a special photograph. Sometimes they’re so effective, they just seal the emotional experience of being there—as if you were right there when that photograph was taken—even if you weren’t!

I think it’s so important that you record these “priceless” descriptions as soon as you can. Some of us might think we can remember all of the details. But face it, you probably won’t be able to. They’re fleeting. And even if you could, you and your memory aren’t going to be on this earth forever.

With prints, it was easy to record this information by writing the stories by hand on the back. But, now that we are wishing to move our prints, slides and negatives to a digital form in our computer, how do we easily add this information so that it can live with each master image file?

Use 1 of These Photo Managers If You Care About Your Photo Collection
Use 1 of These Photo Managers If You Care About Your Photo Collection

It was seriously a life changing day when I discovered the magic of a “non-destructive” photo managing program.

With “non-destructive” editing, all of the edits (enhancements) you make to your photographs are managed by the program itself. Your original photo remains untouched. It’s like having a guardian angel that protects your master images at all costs. It’s brilliant and is 100% absolutely indispensable to me now.

What Everybody Ought to Know When Naming Your Scanned Photos – Part 1
What Everybody Ought to Know When Naming Your Scanned Photos – Part 1

As my own scanned photo collection grows, it has really become obvious to me how thankful I am for the added attention I have been putting into the filenames I give to all of my scanned images.

When you’re scanning, it’s really easy to get into a “robotic” mindset where you are just trying to scan as many photos as possible in a sitting. So when you get to that blank field each time that asks you to type in a name for the file, it’s tempting to just quickly bang out a few descriptive words with little thought to how useful they will be to anyone later.

The DPI You Should Be Scanning Your Paper Photographs
The DPI You Should Be Scanning Your Paper Photographs

One of the most important decisions you face when scanning anything with your scanner is choosing what dpi (“dots per inch”) to scan with. And specifically for this post, what is the best dpi to use when scanning and archiving your 8×10″ and smaller paper photographic prints – which for most people, make up the majority of our pre-digital collection.

Making this decision was very challenging for me and certainly a huge part of my 8 year delay. The reason for this is that dpi is the critical variable in a fairly simple mathematical equation that will determine several important outcomes for your digital images.

Related Posts

Photoshop + Lightroom for $9.99/mo. — Adobe’s Limited Time Photographer’s Offer

Photoshop + Lightroom for $9.99/mo. — Adobe’s Limited Time Photographer’s Offer

If you’re a photo enthusiast who uses, or has even thought about using both Adobe’s Photoshop and Lightroom, you might want to at least consider this deal that Adobe is still offering — but not for long!

For $9.99 a month, when you sign up a one-year plan, you will have ongoing access to the latest versions of both Photoshop CC (Creative Cloud) and Lightroom (currently version 5) via their new Creative Cloud subscription model. This is not an introductory price.

But don’t spend too long deciding if this is right for you — this deal is only being honored until December 31, 2013.

Honestly, I’m thinking about signing up for this.

How Two Lucky Grandparents Were Given Free Restored Photo Treasures By This Internet Thing

How Two Lucky Grandparents Were Given Free Restored Photo Treasures By This Internet Thing

I came across a story by Anne Sewell on Digital Journal (via PetaPixel) the other day that caught my attention. Anne found an interesting 7-minute video that had just been posted on YouTube the day before.

It’s a fun “time-lapse” video of someone’s computer screen while they were doing digital restoration work on a fairly damaged older photograph of a pretty lady and set to a nice piece of up-beat music.

Check out the fascinating video below!

What Would You Take?

What Would You Take?

This is a guest post by Trevor Rumsey.

A couple of weeks ago I was reading the November 19th, 2012 issue of People magazine which talked about some of the stories of rescues and survival around the recent superstorm Sandy that hit the Eastern seaboard of the United States.

One article entitled “Found in the Wreckage” (pages 58-59) caught my attention. The article spotlighted eight different families whose homes were destroyed by the storm.

It showed each of them holding the possession that they grabbed as they frantically abandoned their home to escape the storm and save their lives.

As I was reading the article I started to put myself in their place and to think about what would I take if I only had enough space and time to grab one or two things?

As I thought on this it didn’t take long to come up with the answer.

Leave a Comment Below

Subscribe by email to new comments without commenting
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments