The Importance of Descriptive Filenames for Scanned Photos
In today’s digital world, much of our technology handles organization for us, often with little effort on our part. But when it comes to preserving memories — especially scanned photos from film —a thoughtful filename can make a big difference. Descriptive filenames might seem minor, but they play a key role in keeping your photo collection organized and accessible for years to come.
As we rely more on devices that minimize our interaction with file systems, it’s easy to overlook filenames. However, for scanned photos with sentimental value, a well-chosen filename can be invaluable. It not only helps you manage your collection but also ensures future generations can understand the context of each image. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but without a clear filename, those words might be lost.
In this article, we’ll explore ten compelling reasons why investing time in creating descriptive filenames for your scanned photos is worthwhile. Whether you’re organizing your collection or thinking about your family’s future, these examples will show just how impactful a good filename can be.
Cross-Platform Compatibility
If you transfer photos between different computer systems or share them with others, having clear filenames can be helpful, especially if the recipient uses a different photo organizing application or none at all.
Imagine you’ve organized all your scanned photos into a special photo organizing application on your computer, and everything is working smoothly. But one day, something goes wrong with the application, and suddenly, you can’t open the application anymore. Now, you need to find a specific photo, but the application that used to show you all the pictures in neat little boxes is no longer available. If each photo has a clear and descriptive name, you can still look at the list of filenames on your computer or other devices and know exactly which photo is which, even without the application.
This is especially important if you need to move or copy these photos to another device or computer. Descriptive filenames act as a backup plan, giving you a way to recognize and organize your photos when the fancy tools you’re used to aren’t working. It’s like labeling the boxes in your attic; even if the lights go out, you’ll still know what’s inside each one.
Sorting and Browsing
Detailed filenames can make it easier to sort and browse photos in a computer's file system, especially if you sort them alphabetically or by date. This can be useful when you’re looking through a large collection without specialized photo management software.
Imagine you have a large box filled with hundreds of printed photos, all mixed up from different events, like vacations, birthdays, and holidays. If you want to find a specific photo, like from a particular birthday party, it would take a long time to sift through the entire box without any organization. But if you had organized the photos into labeled envelopes or folders, it would be much easier and faster to find the exact picture you’re looking for.
In the digital world, detailed filenames serve a similar purpose. When your photos have clear and specific names, it’s like organizing them into those labeled folders. If you sort your files by name or date, the photos will naturally group together in a way that makes sense, like keeping all the photos from one event or time period together. This makes it much easier to browse through your collection and find what you need, even if you’re not using any special software to help.
Legacy Systems
Older computer systems or software that don’t leverage advanced photo metadata or tagging might still rely heavily on filenames for organization.
Think about an old family photo album that your grandparents might have. Each photo might have a little note written underneath, describing who’s in the picture and when it was taken. Now, imagine you’re trying to organize a bunch of digital photos on an older computer or using an older program that doesn’t have all the fancy features we have today, like automatic tagging or facial recognition.
These older systems don’t always show the small photo thumbnail images, and they might not know how to read the extra information (metadata) that newer programs use to organize photos. Instead, they rely on the filenames to tell you what each photo is about. If you’ve given your photos detailed and descriptive filenames, you’ll have no trouble finding and organizing them, even on these older systems. Without those clear filenames, it would be like looking through a photo album with no notes — much harder to figure out which photo is which.
Backup and Storage
When backing up photos or storing them on external drives, descriptive filenames can quickly identify files without needing specialized software.
Think of your digital photos like a collection of books on a shelf. Even though you can see the covers (or, in the case of photos, photo thumbnail images), the title on the spine helps you quickly identify which book (or photo) you’re looking for. When you back up your photos to another device or storage, those clear, descriptive filenames act like the titles on the spines of books.
Even though you can see the thumbnail images, the filenames give you extra information that might not be immediately obvious from just looking at the picture — like who’s in the photo, when it was taken, or what the occasion was. This becomes especially helpful when you have a lot of similar-looking photos. Detailed filenames help you recognize what’s important about each photo at a glance, making it quicker and easier to manage your backups, especially if you need to find a specific image later.
Integration with Non-Photo Applications
If you use photos in other applications (such as word processors, presentation software, or web development tools), descriptive filenames can make it easier to find and insert the correct images.
When you’re putting together a project like a family newsletter or a presentation, you often need to include photos. As you go to add these photos to your document, the program might only show you a list of filenames instead of displaying the images themselves. Without descriptive filenames, you’re left guessing which file is the right one, making the process slower and more confusing.
However, if each photo has a descriptive name, you can easily identify the one you want without having to open each file to check. This makes it much simpler to find the exact images you need, helping you stay organized and focused on the task at hand. Descriptive filenames act like helpful labels, guiding you directly to the right photos, so you can quickly and confidently insert them into your project.
Automated Processes
If you use automation tools to process photos (such as batch renaming, resizing, or converting formats), having a consistent and descriptive filename structure can simplify these tasks and reduce errors.
When working with a large number of photos, you might use special tools or computer programs to handle repetitive tasks like renaming, resizing, or converting the images. These tools can process many photos at once, saving you a lot of time. However, for the tools to work correctly, they often rely on the filenames to understand what to do with each photo.
If your photos have consistent and descriptive filenames, these tools can easily follow the pattern and apply the right changes to the right files. This helps prevent mistakes, like accidentally renaming or resizing the wrong images. It’s similar to giving clear instructions to someone who’s helping you with a big project; the more precise and organized your instructions are, the less likely it is that something will go wrong.
Long-Term Archiving
For long-term archiving and future retrieval, descriptive filenames can be beneficial as a fallback. Metadata and tags might not always be preserved or accessible, especially if file formats or software tools change over time.
When you save photos for the long term, you want to make sure that you’ll be able to find and recognize them years down the line, even if the technology you use changes. While today’s photo apps might let you tag or label your photos in all sorts of ways, these tags and labels are stored as extra information that could get lost if the app or file format becomes outdated.
Descriptive filenames, on the other hand, are part of the actual file itself, so they stay with the photo no matter where you move it or what device you open it on. This means that even if you’re looking at these photos many years from now, or on a different computer, you’ll still know what each photo is just by looking at the name. It’s like writing a note on the back of a physical photo — it doesn’t matter what album or box it’s stored in, the note stays with the picture and tells you what you need to know, even decades later.
File Sharing Services
When sharing photos through file-sharing services (like Dropbox, Google Drive, iCloud, or even email attachments), descriptive filenames can provide immediate context to the recipient without needing to open each file.
When you share photos with others through file-sharing services like Dropbox, Google Drive, iCloud or by sending them as email attachments, the person receiving them might not have the same tools you do to organize and view the images. Often, they’ll only see the filenames until they open each file.
If the filenames are clear and descriptive, the person receiving the photos can quickly understand what each image is about without having to open every single one. This is especially helpful when you’re sharing multiple photos at once. It’s like sending someone a package with labels on each item inside; the labels help them know what’s in the box before they even unwrap it. Descriptive filenames give the recipient a sense of what they’re looking at right away, making the whole process smoother and more efficient for everyone involved.
Avoiding Duplication
Descriptive filenames can help prevent unintentional duplication of photos by clearly indicating what each file contains, thus making it easier to spot and manage duplicates.
When you have a large collection of photos, it’s easy to accidentally save the same picture more than once, especially if the files have generic names like “IMG_001” or “Photo1.” Over time, these duplicates can clutter your storage, making it harder to find the photos you actually want and wasting valuable space.
Descriptive filenames help you avoid this problem by clearly stating what each file contains. When you give each photo a meaningful name, it becomes much easier to spot duplicates at a glance. For example, if you see two files with the same or very similar names, you can quickly tell they might be duplicates and decide whether you need to keep both. This way, you can keep your photo collection organized and free of unnecessary copies, saving you time and storage space in the long run.
Software Limitations
Not all photo management software or devices may fully support photo metadata or tags, making descriptive filenames a more universally compatible way to organize and identify photos.
When you’re organizing your photos, you might rely on special features like tags, keywords, or other metadata that some photo management software provides. These tools help you sort and find your photos easily. However, not all software or devices can read this extra information, especially older ones or more basic programs.
Descriptive filenames act as a backup plan in case your software doesn’t support those advanced features. Even if the software can’t read the tags or metadata, the filenames will still be there, providing you with the essential details you need to identify and organize your photos. It’s like writing important notes directly on a file folder; even if someone else doesn’t have the same filing system as you, they can still understand what’s inside just by looking at the label. This way, your photos remain organized and easy to manage, no matter what device or software you’re using.
This is a very interesting article, so of course, I read every word. I have about 5000 old photos retrieved from my paternal grandmother’s house when I shut it down, and of course, all of my own during my 61 years of marriage. My naming method is year, month, day (if known), people (not us). Ex: 1960s, PNS,D-T (=Digna & Tony). If my daughters, MAC1, MAC2, MAC3, their initials and birth order. So far it’s worked for me. Years ago, when I started publishing my books, I discovered “Bitly”, and always wished a brilliant person would develop a similar system for photos.
Hi Curtis,
Apologies in advance for the lengthy reply … but I wanted to address the matter of filenames for scanned images in the wider context of building and managing a large collection of scanned images from many different sources. I tried to include a screen shot to illustrate what I was talking about, but this didn’t work.
I completely agree that some kind of systematic descriptive file name for scans is useful and worth the effort. It’s a good use of time to think through how much info and what info is needed in a filename, what info can go into image file metadata, and what info can be retained in a simple database of the images.
My context: in 2020 I began the process of sorting and scanning 15,000 35mm slides, and 10,000 printed photographs and negatives, and about 500 antique magic lantern slides (and joined Scan Your Entire Life in 2021). Before starting, I defined a scanned image file name protocol with originally 11 fields that was reduced quickly to 8 fields that give a filename like this:
“1990.03.15 SLDD G13.1 SL12 EPSS10.4 04346.tif”
<yyyy.mm.d1-d2> <media><collection> <Sort Group> <Image No> <Scanner><Scan setting> <Scan Number>.<image extension>
The fields: <yyy.mm.d1-d2>: ISO standard date format (with a possible day range);
<media>: slide, photo, negative, lantern slide (SL, PH, NG, LA)
<collection>: The initials of the person to whom the inage belongs (me, my wife).
<Sort Group>: A unique number that identifies a “Group” of related images. This is usually defined by an event or period of time.
<Image Number>: The number of the image associated with its sequence in a film.
<Scanner>: The scanning device used (for me either Epson, Wolverine, or Canon>.
<Scan setting>: An indicator referring to the collective scanner settings used for that image.
<Scan number>: The sequential scan index within each media category .
<Image extension>: JPG, TIF etc.
So the example filename is for an image that was captured on March 15, 1990, it is a 35mm slide from the collection of DD (me), it belongs to the group of slide images G13.1 and it is the 12th slide in that group, it was scanned with my Epson (EPS) using the slide scan settings identified collectively as S10.4, and it is the 4346th slide image in the entire collection of slides to be scanned.
The filename fields that I dropped very early on because they were too clumsy to use included: a short image description, a code for the image quality/exposure (over exposed, under exposed, unfocussed, blurred …) and an image context field (looking in the direction of … taken from …). Instead of jamming this information into the filename, I decided to put it into a simple spreadsheet database that is searchable. Additional fields in the spreadsheet database enable me to record a specific reference to the storage box, the tray within that box, and the bin within that tray, in which the 35mm slide is stored. My storage system for photos, negatives, and magic lantern slides, is a bit different, but similarly I can record the physical location of the original image in the spreadsheet database. I can also show which of the images on that particular film are in the Group, and add a bit of info about who/what is in the image.
Originally, I had included much of this information in image metadata, but I lost a lot of that work in the upgrade of my image application to a new version, and the subsequent migration to a different app. Sticking with a filename that has high information content, and linking this with some sort of searchable source of more detailed information about the images seems to be a practical solution. I suppose this effort is only worthwhile when the scanned image collection exceeds a certain minimum size.
The key to my system is the image Group Number. Again, this number is related to the context in which the image was captured and it refers to “groups” of images that are related by virtue of the date or location of their capture, and the film that they were originally recorded on. The sequence of Group Numbers in my collection is an artefact of the order in which I sorted out the hundreds of old slide boxes and re-grouped the mixed up images. Ultimately in my database I sorted the Groups by the date of event/image capture which is more relevant. Here is a screen shot of part of my spreadsheet database (it includes near the bottom of the screen shot the database entry for image Group 13.1 that contains the image used to illustrate the filename protocol above). In this database colours are used in the various fields to convey additional information.