The Coolest Place For Bill Gates to Store His 15 Million Famous and Historically Important Photographs

by | Last updated Apr 21, 2017 | Storing Originals, Acquiring Originals | 2 comments

Corbis Iron Mountain Cold Storage Facility - Huge wall of storage drawers

The Corbis collection inside Iron Mountain, the 150 acre cold storage facility in Boyers, Pennsylvania. © CBS

If you're having problems just coming up with a suitable place to safely store your family's photo collection, then think what it would be like storing the 15 million photographs, negatives and glass plates that make up this Corbis collection!

PopPhoto recently posted this video from CBS “The Early Show” that gives us a rare look inside of Iron Mountain, a 150 acre maximum security cold storage facility (vault) 220 feet below ground in Boyers, Pennsylvania in what used to be a limestone mine. These photos that are stored in a part of this space go back to the 19th century — 150 years — covering celebrities, athletes, presidents and iconic historical moments.

Take a look at this fascinating 6 minutes of video:

 © CBS “The Early Show” / Problems playing video? try here

 

I've seen this video several times now and every time I watch it, I think the same thing — I'm so glad someone is looking out for these photos!

If you didn't catch it, 4:00 minutes into the video, Ken Johnston, the chief historian and archivist that oversees the collection, says that 99% of the collection is made up of images where the photographer who took them is unknown.

Doesn't that almost seem hard to believe!?

Some of us can hardly take care of our own collections made up of maybe only several thousand photos. But here are 13+ million photographs that have been orphaned, and if all goes well, according to Ken they now have the chance of lasting for thousands of years.

Origin of This Corbis Collection

Bill Gates founded the company Interactive Home Systems in 1989, which was later renamed Corbis (Latin for “wicker basket”), because he believed the future of artwork in people's homes would be a revolving display of images. The company would eventually “beam” great art works of human history to large television monitors decorating our walls.

While this technology was being developed, Corbis began acquiring the rights to millions of these images. They also license them for a fee to publishing, television and film companies who need specific images for their work.

The Tonight Show Treatment

A little side note here that might interest some. The first time I heard about the storage of masters in old mines was when I found out the resting place for all of the surviving videotape masters for “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson.” Twenty or so years of the thirty year run of this show are safely archived in a salt mine 650 feet below ground in Hutchinson, Kansas.

I was also very happy to learn — the huge fan I was of this show when I was growing up — that all 3,300 hours of these Tonight Show videotapes have been digitized. So hopefully, someday, us fans will be able to get a hold of some more DVD box sets!

Or even better, how about re-running The Tonight Show every weekday at 11:30 p.m. on TV Land!?

Never-ending Deterioration

In “The Top 13 Reasons Why You Should Already Be Scanning Your Photo Collection,” I mentioned deterioration as a serious motivator. Time just won't stop for the aging process.

At 3:34 minutes into the video you saw how even well-cared for photos are almost ruined. This should be a wake-up call to any of us who are still dragging our feet to start digitizing our collection.

Deteriorating negative in Ken Johnston's hands

Ken Johnston holding a deteriorating negative “where the plastic base is literally turning to vinegar.” (3:32 min)  © CBS

Cracked Glass Negative for "Lunch atop a Skyscraper, 1932"

The glass negative for the famous “Lunch atop a Skyscraper, 1932” is now cracked in many places! (3:46 min)  © CBS

Considering how cautious I have become with my own collection, I thought it was almost surprising that Ken doesn't feel it's necessary to wear protective gloves when handling these historically important negatives and prints. Are finger oils and prints not a concern this far below ground? Or maybe he was concerned they would make him look dainty on camera.

Who “Owns” History?

What I especially enjoyed was the discussion at the end of the video between the two anchors. If you didn't watch the video, it was about the controversy with some with how much of this collection was purchased by the billionaire Bill Gates, and was then moved from New York and stuffed down in this 45 degree underground vault in the middle of nowhere.

Some of the worry was probably that these historical artifacts may never see the light of day. And I think a lot of that went away when they saw how much of it was being digitized and given access to by the public. And when things are digitized, quite often it actually means more access than before because of searchability and more convenient access.

But, I think the real remaining uneasiness comes down to a more fundamental concern and that is:

No matter how much credit Corbis deserves for preserving such an important collection, should any one company really have the right to “own” and control this much history?

What do you think? I would love to hear your thoughts.

Are You Ready to Get Serious With Your Photo Collection?

Join 10,280+ people enjoying the exclusive newsletter, tutorials, occasional blog updates, and tips and tricks you won't find anywhere else on this website sent right to your inbox.

Are You Ready to Get Serious With Your Photo Collection?

Join 10,280+ people enjoying the exclusive newsletter, tutorials, occasional blog updates, and tips and tricks you won't find anywhere else on this website sent right to your inbox.

Popular Posts

Epson Scan 2 — Will It Work With My Scanner?
Epson Scan 2 — Will It Work With My Scanner?

Epson quietly released a new version of their popular scanning software “Epson Scan” that comes bundled with their document and flatbed photo scanners. But, there’s already been confusion as to which scanners and operating systems it supports. Could it be possible that “Epson Scan 2” won’t even run in the latest versions of Microsoft Windows?

Epson V800 vs V850 — The 5 Differences and Which You Should Buy
Epson V800 vs V850 — The 5 Differences and Which You Should Buy

So you’re ready to buy a very high-quality flatbed scanner to digitize your analog prints and film, but now you’re having a hard time deciding between the Epson Perfection V800 Photo and the Epson Perfection V850 Pro Photo Scanners.

Whether you or an avid hobby photographer, a true professional, or just want to get all the quality you can out of your prints and film, either one of these models is going to give you exceptional results. But, I want to help you feel confident you’re going to make the right choice.

Below, in plain English that will make it very easy to understand, I’ve written out and explained in detail, the 5 differences between the two models.

Are 99.9% of Your Photographs Just Not Important Enough To Save?
Are 99.9% of Your Photographs Just Not Important Enough To Save?

If this was your entire photo collection sitting in this trash can in the photo above, would this make you actually feel relief … or utter panic?

What if I added to this scenario. What if to the best of your knowledge, all of your photos sitting in the trash were already scanned and safely backed up on a couple of your hard drives.

Do you now feel relieved … or still utterly panicked?

From everyone I have talked to about this scenario, it seems safe for me to say that I believe the world is in somewhat of a divide whether it’s actually okay to throw away your prints and slides once they have been scanned and digitally preserved.

And for some, hopefully not too many, I am sure they would say it’s okay to throw away many if not most photos before they were scanned and preserved.

Yes. You heard me.

If You Don’t Add This to the Filename of Your Scanned Photos, You’ll Probably Hate Yourself Later
If You Don’t Add This to the Filename of Your Scanned Photos, You’ll Probably Hate Yourself Later

Whether you keep all of your scanned master (original) image files in folders on a hard drive, or you allow an image manager like Picasa, iPhoto or Aperture to manage them inside a library file, you will still be required to give each photo a filename.

It could be as simple and non-descriptive as “photo-1.jpg” or maybe even simple yet somewhat descriptive like “mom at the beach 1984.tif”.

But, it’s actually a very important part of the process of scanning photos, that if done with a little bit of forethought, can save you a lot of time and headache later.

My Inspiring Photo Scanning Progress Report for April 2012
My Inspiring Photo Scanning Progress Report for April 2012

Welcome to my third monthly progress report!

Last month I covered two complete months of scanning, but I learned that was just too much to talk about!

So this time is only one month and it’ll be a lot shorter.

What This Progress Report Is Really About:

Every month, I am posting a detailed report — just like this one — sharing with you how far I have come with my goal to scan and restore my entire 10,000+ family photo collection.

By doing so, I hope to inspire you to do the same!

In my first progress report, I set a goal for myself to do a little bit of work on my collection every single day. I shoot for about an hour a day which turns out to be about 30 scans a day. And I am going to record and detail each one of them so that you can learn from my transparency.

I don’t want to be “that guy” — a guy that tells you how you should scan your own photos but then sends all of my own to a scanning service to do the work for me.

How Quickly You Could Scan Your Entire Photo Collection — What I Discovered From My First Week of Scanning
How Quickly You Could Scan Your Entire Photo Collection — What I Discovered From My First Week of Scanning

So you have a closet with boxes full of old prints and slides that you are dying to have scanned and neatly organized on your computer.

The problem is, you’re worried about it either costing you way too much money to send it to a scanning service, or taking too much of your precious free time to scan them yourself on a flatbed scanner.

Does this sound EXACTLY like your dilemma?

I’d like to share with you my experience back scanning photos for the first week. If you want to make scanning your own photos fit into your busy and hectic life, I think my experience here might give you an idea how much time will be involved and how many photos you can easily get through.

The Best Way to Add a Description (Caption) to Your Scanned Photos
The Best Way to Add a Description (Caption) to Your Scanned Photos

Ah, there’s nothing quite like reading a great caption to go along with a special photograph. Sometimes they’re so effective, they just seal the emotional experience of being there—as if you were right there when that photograph was taken—even if you weren’t!

I think it’s so important that you record these “priceless” descriptions as soon as you can. Some of us might think we can remember all of the details. But face it, you probably won’t be able to. They’re fleeting. And even if you could, you and your memory aren’t going to be on this earth forever.

With prints, it was easy to record this information by writing the stories by hand on the back. But, now that we are wishing to move our prints, slides and negatives to a digital form in our computer, how do we easily add this information so that it can live with each master image file?

Use 1 of These Photo Managers If You Care About Your Photo Collection
Use 1 of These Photo Managers If You Care About Your Photo Collection

It was seriously a life changing day when I discovered the magic of a “non-destructive” photo managing program.

With “non-destructive” editing, all of the edits (enhancements) you make to your photographs are managed by the program itself. Your original photo remains untouched. It’s like having a guardian angel that protects your master images at all costs. It’s brilliant and is 100% absolutely indispensable to me now.

What Everybody Ought to Know When Naming Your Scanned Photos – Part 1
What Everybody Ought to Know When Naming Your Scanned Photos – Part 1

As my own scanned photo collection grows, it has really become obvious to me how thankful I am for the added attention I have been putting into the filenames I give to all of my scanned images.

When you’re scanning, it’s really easy to get into a “robotic” mindset where you are just trying to scan as many photos as possible in a sitting. So when you get to that blank field each time that asks you to type in a name for the file, it’s tempting to just quickly bang out a few descriptive words with little thought to how useful they will be to anyone later.

The DPI You Should Be Scanning Your Paper Photographs
The DPI You Should Be Scanning Your Paper Photographs

One of the most important decisions you face when scanning anything with your scanner is choosing what dpi (“dots per inch”) to scan with. And specifically for this post, what is the best dpi to use when scanning and archiving your 8×10″ and smaller paper photographic prints – which for most people, make up the majority of our pre-digital collection.

Making this decision was very challenging for me and certainly a huge part of my 8 year delay. The reason for this is that dpi is the critical variable in a fairly simple mathematical equation that will determine several important outcomes for your digital images.

Related Posts

What Would You Take?

What Would You Take?

This is a guest post by Trevor Rumsey.

A couple of weeks ago I was reading the November 19th, 2012 issue of People magazine which talked about some of the stories of rescues and survival around the recent superstorm Sandy that hit the Eastern seaboard of the United States.

One article entitled “Found in the Wreckage” (pages 58-59) caught my attention. The article spotlighted eight different families whose homes were destroyed by the storm.

It showed each of them holding the possession that they grabbed as they frantically abandoned their home to escape the storm and save their lives.

As I was reading the article I started to put myself in their place and to think about what would I take if I only had enough space and time to grab one or two things?

As I thought on this it didn’t take long to come up with the answer.

Are 99.9% of Your Photographs Just Not Important Enough To Save?

Are 99.9% of Your Photographs Just Not Important Enough To Save?

If this was your entire photo collection sitting in this trash can in the photo above, would this make you actually feel relief … or utter panic?

What if I added to this scenario. What if to the best of your knowledge, all of your photos sitting in the trash were already scanned and safely backed up on a couple of your hard drives.

Do you now feel relieved … or still utterly panicked?

From everyone I have talked to about this scenario, it seems safe for me to say that I believe the world is in somewhat of a divide whether it’s actually okay to throw away your prints and slides once they have been scanned and digitally preserved.

And for some, hopefully not too many, I am sure they would say it’s okay to throw away many if not most photos before they were scanned and preserved.

Yes. You heard me.

Best Photo Slide Box to Safely Archive Your Slides — Logan Slide File Review (Video)

Best Photo Slide Box to Safely Archive Your Slides — Logan Slide File Review (Video)

If you’re looking for something to store all of your 35-millimeter slides in, you should consider checking out the slide file made by a company called Logan.

It’s a very nice all-metal box with a hinged lid, two metal clasps to keep it shut and a little handle to carry it by.

I bought three of these because I actually couldn’t find what I thought I was looking for, which were these small, little cardboard boxes that hold maybe 70 or so slides that my dad had been using for many, many years to keep his entire slide collection in.

The Logan Slide File is about US$29.95 a piece. When I bought mine they were $26.95 so they’re not cheap. But almost anything slide-related seems to carry a premium right now in the digital era. But from every slide container I found, this seemed to be the best.

I was very happy to read that this slide file box has been made for about 40 years now and for those who like buying US products, you will be happy to know that they’re all made here in the United States in the City of Bartlett, Illinois.

Leave a Comment Below

Subscribe by email to new comments without commenting
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments