Why It Took Me 8 Years to Scan My 2nd Photograph

by | Last updated May 17, 2017 | My Blog, Scanning Photos | 16 comments

Photo of me on my first pony ride

Here's the first photo from my family's collection I scanned. (Yup that's me apparently on my very first pony ride)

I didn't scan it for an immediate use such as to print it out for our refrigerator or to send it to my Aunt K. through email (though I am sure she would have appreciated it). I scanned this picture with quality in mind so if properly cared for, this digital master would not only outlive the paper print, but would also be more useful due to the benefits of digital replication. What I am talking about here is archiving.

Well that flash of genius was on August 8, 2001 – about 8 years before I started scanning again.

So why the long delay?  Why couldn't I get my act together?

Even though my family's photo collection is made up of thousands of prints, slides and negatives, I'm pretty sure it wasn't the amount of work involved that slowed me down. I have been a “computer guy” ever since I set eyes on my school's Atari 800 in 1980, so it wasn't an intimidation of technology. And I can't even blame it on a lack of time because I could have made some time on weekends or even 30 minutes on an occasional weekday night to scan in a few.

So if I'm completely honest with you, the real reason for my procrastination was my often crippling nature to achieve a personal level of perfection with almost everything I do. I knew I didn't want to start scanning, I mean really scanning the lot until I knew I had a proper workflow that produced a level of quality I would be content with.

I didn't want to reach the finish line with a completed digital collection and be told by someone I did it all wrong and should start over from the very first scan.

And let me add here that even though I set the standards for my photo collection high, I don't believe I am trying to achieve a level of professionalism that one should only expect with the most expensive equipment and years of talent and experience. I am merely refining a formula where I am doing the best I can do with my modest scanner, software and abilities.

I wouldn't be surprised if most of you feel you have the same goals as well.

And before you ask, of course it occurred to me I could send them all to a scanning service. As much as I love what these services do and how much they help those who aren't interested in doing the work themselves, I am just not one of those who can part with their irreplaceable photos – not even for a few weeks. One of my wife's grandfathers wouldn't even allow his own grandchildren to take his photos out of his living room! So I think I can forgive myself for my conservative caretaking here.

Some of you new to archiving photographs might be asking yourselves, “Well how hard is it really? You just place a photo in the scanner, set it to ‘full-auto' mode, hit the scan button and out comes a digital file on your desktop.”

Archiving is a Different Animal

Maybe it's the meticulous conditioning from being a professional video editor for many years, or maybe it's just this level of perfectionism I have always placed upon myself. Either way I had to shut down my production line back in 2001 because I was having way too many questions in my head every time I went to scan in that second photo.

  • What is the best resolution to scan prints for archiving? 200, 300, 600… 1200 ppi?  Even higher?
  • Do I allow the scanner to automatically color correct my photos or is it better to do this later in my image editing program? And if I do allow it to, what if later I want to return to the nostalgic “deteriorated” look of my 1970's photos?
  • Should I scan in my square prints from the 1960's with the white border around them? If I don't, what I if I want them back later because they have information on them such as the printing date or handwritten captions?
  • When two photos look similar, what's the best way to give them filenames? If I go with “christmas 1989-1” and “christmas 1989-2”, how do I know this is the correct chronological order? When my software sorts them by filename, this naming methodology will be important to get them to sort in the correct order.
  • Is scanning in 48-bit mode necessary to get the best quality?
  • Wouldn't it be best to buy a the latest and greatest scanner? Won't I get a better image this way?
  • Do I have to buy the $699 Adobe Photoshop to touch up or restore my images?

The complete list was much longer – trust me. But I think you get the idea.

The thing about scanning your photographs for archival purposes, which really is the way we all need to be doing it for long-term preservation, is you need to go into each scan assuming this is the last time you will ever get to digitize this photograph.

You never know if tomorrow your house will be burned to the ground, flooded or robbed. Maybe you are borrowing a set of photographs from a relative. You may never get the chance to borrow them again. And let's face it, the amount of time or money this requires will probably discourage you from doing it all over again years from now. So it's best to believe this a one shot deal.

Whichever formula you settle on to scan with – however you set your scanning software's settings today before you hit that scan button –  will affect the amount of choices you have when repurposing your master images tomorrow.

So please let me persuade you into believing it's in your best interest and the future generations ahead of you who will be accessing them when you are no longer around, to leave behind the “rawest” and highest quality masters as you possible can.

Plastic bin full of family photo albums I get to scan

In this plastic bin lies my future – just some of my family's photo albums jammed full of prints and newspaper clippings that I get to scan.

An Expert Education

For those 8 years in between scans, I was reading up on how the experts as well as the dedicated novices were archiving their own photographs. And I wasn't just trying to learn how they were scanning but also how they were saving, correcting and managing all of their images. I was devouring as much information as I could find to extract and refine the perfect digital workflow. And of course, there was some so called scanning procrastination on my part in between. Okay yes a lot of procrastination.

Well it turns out there is a fair amount of “expert” opinions out there vocalizing what they think is best for our photographs. And even though I was learning a lot, I was becoming frustrated because the second I thought I had learned a hard and fast rule for say a particular scanner setting, I would find another expert who also had a good yet contradictory argument to use a different setting.

For example one expert will state it's best to scan paper prints at the “highest optical resolution” your scanner will capture yet another will swear there's no noticeable benefit scanning paper prints above 200 dpi. Many advocate buying an additional and expensive piece of professional scanning software so you can restore (crop, remove dust and scratches, color correct etc.) during the scanning process instead of later in “post” with an image editor. While others argue there's no need to use the corrective tools in scanning software because the algorithms in image editors are always better. And some swear by Adobe Photoshop even with the expense and learning curve and others say it's complete overkill.

There Really is No One Perfect Workflow

Technology is always going to change and improve, but what often stays the same are one's goals for their archived digital photo collection.

Right now, from everything I have learned so far, I could write out for you a complete list of steps that in my opinion you should do to properly archive your photos. And your photos will look good – I mean really good. But in the end, if you aren't willing or for any understandable reason you aren't capable of following along, you too will be stuck for 8 or more years without a digitally preserved collection. And those prints, negatives and slides aren't getting any younger are they?  (Your head should be shaking back and forth here)

We each have our own bar to set – a threshold of quality we need to achieve to satisfy our own expectations.

The quality you expect from your master files could quite possibly be abominable to me and my OCD tendencies. But seriously that's okay if it's an ideal fit for you and your collection. And on the opposite end, I know certain things I am willing to let slide may not suffice for those looking for true professional “museum-like” archival perfection.

And I am not just speaking to those who want to scan their own collections. If you're seeking help from a scanning service, finding a company that uses the right workflow is just as critical. For example, those with the greatest expectations will find a “stack fed” automated service probably won't suffice. Your time will be well spent choosing a service that inspects and personally scans and corrects each photo by hand and eye. And if your expectations are low, you may decide it's not worth the money for this “white glove treatment.”

My list of scanning services will help you considerably. Not only does it rank them in order by personal user ratings, but the data I collected on each company will provide you with all of the hard to decipher details to help you find the perfect fit.

The best way for us all to digitize our photographs – this formula … this “perfect workflow” – is the one that will actually get us to the finish line with our individual goals met and a complete digital collection we are proud of.

And one last thing – that first photo I scanned, you know the one of me on the pony – don't you think I have my parents to blame at least a little bit for my touch of OCD? I mean check out those matching socks! The pressure I must have been under as a child trying to maintain such an obsession for order. (Now your head should be shaking up and down)

Related Posts

Aiming for the Stars to Hit a Cowpie — My Enlightening Scanning Journey

Aiming for the Stars to Hit a Cowpie — My Enlightening Scanning Journey

As a Wyoming farm gal, I was raised with the phrase “It’s better to aim for the stars and miss than to aim for a cowpie and hit.” Well, that’s great advice … unless your goal actually is to hit the cowpie.

My scanning goal really was that simple, but for some reason, aiming at the cowpie just wasn’t working. So I changed strategies and aimed for the stars. The result? Read on to find out. And hopefully, by sharing my scanning journey, it will help you on your scanning journey.

Scanning All of Our Family Photos … What’s the Actual Point?

Scanning All of Our Family Photos … What’s the Actual Point?

For anyone with children, or with other family members such as nieces or nephews, the answer to whether or not we should scan our old family prints, slides and negatives may seem quite obvious.

But, when I received this email from Jennie, asking me why she should go through all the trouble of taking on such a big scanning and organizing project when she doesn’t have younger family to pass it on to, I was struck with the thought that many of you might be asking yourselves the same question. Maybe even for some of you who actually do have family to pass your scanned collections on to!

If you don’t have or know anyone that will truly cherish your scanned photo collection once you’ve passed, is there even a single reason to scan any of your old family photos?

A 70-Year-Old Silver Surfer Scans Her Entire Life!

A 70-Year-Old Silver Surfer Scans Her Entire Life!

Being a man of action as well as words, my son Mark bought me a slide scanner and taught me how to use it. I scanned in the slides of the Holy Land without much difficulty. I was delighted to be able to view them on my computer with the same ease as I could view the digital photographs that I had started taking in 1999.

The remainder of the slides came first. Then I started work on the prints in the photograph albums that I had lovingly curated over the decades. The physical albums had started to deteriorate to the extent that some of them were falling apart. Scanning the prints was an ideal way to remedy this. I also scanned in all the prints that had not made the cut for the photograph albums but I had kept nevertheless. I also spent several months scanning in approximately 4,000 negatives. All in all I must have scanned nearly ten thousand photographs in one form or another.

Leave a Comment Below — (Members: Login before commenting to display your profile)

  Subscribe by email to new comments without commenting  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Sara Strawson
Sara Strawson

I have only recently found this site and sooo relieved to find out that there are many more like me who are afraid of ‘doing it wrong’.

Sadly, I have now discovered from all the helpful advice here, that I was indeed doing it wrong. Unfortunately with some scans that I cannot repeat due to the fact threat they were borrowed photos. The images are ok but very small.

However, I can now move forward and, hopefully, continue in a more efficient and successful way. Thank you so much for working all of this out for us.


ahhh… the OCD roadblock. sad
Five years ago, I thought all I needed was a set of photo albums for my ’46+ years’ collection of photos. I ordered one dozen over-sized leatherette-bound Pioneer albums, acid-free, (of course!) for long-term archival photo-storage…all 12 are still in the shipping boxes. The fear of starting off on a bad foot kept me from starting at all… (sigh…)
Two years ago I bought the Epson Perfection V600, but couldn’t decide what computer to use it with. (either on my new one, with all my too much other stuff, or exclusively on my ‘old’ one but only if I upgrade to Windows 7… but support for that OS is quickly running out…) (sigh…)
Six months ago, I bought Family Historian 6, because if I’m going to scan all of this family history, I SHOULD capture the Family Tree and sequence of events for posterity, right??? (sigh…)
Now I am looking for an appropriate desk, a station, an all-inclusive ‘scanning village’ where every tool is at my fingertips, and every one of your priceless tips and how-to’s right where I can conveniently see them … I see a cork-board overhead, covered with your notes on the ultimate scanning formats I should use on my photos, shelves filled with clear boxes of photos labeled with years and content, drawers for tools, and a large preferably L-shaped work surface. (sigh…)
I cannot tell you how happy I am to discover that ‘wanting to do it right’ and ‘it has to make sense’ are diseases shared by others who take their ‘Family Historian’ responsibility seriously.
I have run out of excuses… I signed up for your course this morning… I’m going in!

Dale Kamp
Dale Kamp

That crippling pursuit of perfection I know too well.


Hi Curtis,

Reading your post makes me think perhaps we were twins separated at birth! I, too, have done a bit of scanning but then let the entire project drop because of so many questions with multiple or every-changing answers. I am going to be meeting a cousin in a couple of weeks to scan some very old family photos and so decided to start searching for “answers” again and came across your post on resolutions. I will be reading through your various posts with heightened interest here in the next week or so as I map out a plan for digitally preserving some precious family photos.

Jan Pearce
Coins: 17
Jan Pearce

Hi Curtis,
Thank you thank you for sharing your hard earned wisdom. I originally came to your site as I searched for answers re. a scanner I was interested in purchasing. I have recently returned from a trip to the other end of the country with this scanner to begin archiving well over a thousand old (late 1800’s to about 1940) pics from a relative, who like your grandfather won’t let the originals out of the living room:) I am excited now to begin the process of archiving these and know your site will be invaluable to me.

This morning I came across your blog about iphoto vs. lightroom. Wow! what a great answer. I had purchased photoshop elements last month (still in the box) to do more advanced editing than iPhoto allows, but now with your information, I think it will be wiser to go with “Aperture” (which your blog explained) and keep it within the iphoto architecture.

I know where to go when I need well thought out answers. Again Thank you

Joe Radomski
Joe Radomski

Just found you tonight, 7/2/14, while researching Lightroom and reading about everyone’s travails of losing photos. Was able to help my daughter recover her new pix of Italy… while she was there. Had to rebuild iPhoto database. But it all came back.

Anyway, just wanted to say, yes, glad you did create this site. You have obviously helped many people and from little I have read, you are very clear and personable. So many videos and classes will go on and on and then rush right through the important stuff.

I am making a new push to get pictures scanned and organized, so I have been looking for good advice and am glad to have found a kindred spirit. Keep it up and Thanks!



i can’t believe there is another person out there who has thought about this as much as me!

looking forward to moving forward…by reading more : )

Lori Flores
Lori Flores

I am happy I found this blog, because this was exactly MY problem when I started scanning all our old pictures about 10 years ago! I did the first year of my first son's life and it got overwhelming, and I wasn't sure about all the correcting and whatnot, and I just quit. Then the computer blew up and I lost everything I had done, because I didn't back it up on a separate hard drive! I was so depressed, I just quit the whole project, but I still want to do it. We have three kids, and they all love the old pictures, but a) I don't want to give up MY pictures, and b) how do you decide which kid gets it if more than one of them is in the picture? So yes, I better get started on my project again before the grandkids start arriving!